If you’ve been around this blog for very long at all, you’ve probably noticed that I spend a lot of time discussing Vanguard, to the exclusion of other mutual fund and brokerage companies. If you don’t know why Vanguard is so special, this post is for you.
Vanguard was founded in 1975 by John C. (Jack) Bogle, being named after Admiral Horatio Nelson’s Flagship at the Battle of the Nile in 1798. It was founded after a dispute arose between Bogle and the members of the board of Wellington Management Company. He was on the board of the Wellington Management Company, but after irreconciliable differences arose between him and other members, he was forced to resign. He then went to the boards of directors of the funds administered by the management company, and by convincing them of the merits of a mutual mutual fund company, they gradually chose to move under the Vanguard umbrella. Since then, Vanguard has internalized the management functions, lowered costs and become the largest mutual fund company in the world.
Mutual Ownership
As the only mutually-owned mutual fund company in the world, Vanguard has eliminated many of the conflicts of interest inherent in the structure of other mutual fund companies. At some companies, such as Fidelity, the fund management company is owned by private owners (the Ned Johnson family). The fund management company then administers the mutual funds, which are owned by the shareholders (you and me.) Obviously, the owners of the fund management company want to make some money. Guess where that profit comes from? Yup, you and me. At other companies, such as T. Rowe Price, the fund management company is owned by public investors, and its shares are traded on the stock market. Those investors also want to earn dividends and want their share values to go up. Guess where the money to do that comes from? You’re right again-from the owners of the mutual fund shares, you and me. So there is a significant conflict inherent in the structures of most mutual fund companies.
At Vanguard, the management company is owned by the mutual funds, which in turn, are owned by you and me. There are no profits or dividends that need to go to the mutual fund company’s owners. What does that mean? It means we get to keep them and it increases our returns over time.
Low Costs
The means by which Vanguard sends these profits on to you is by lower expenses. In 1990, the average Vanguard expense ratio was 0.35%. The average of the rest of the industry was 1.09%, an advantage of 0.74% a year. Since then, things have gotten even worse (? better.) Vanguard’s average expense ratio is now 0.25%. and the industry has increased to 1.38%, a difference of 1.13% a year. You don’t need to know much about compound interest to know that 1.13% a year compounded over 2 or 3 decades is a huge amount of money.
Performance
As you would expect, these lower expenses allow Vanguard funds to outperform its peers, especially in the fixed income categories. For the five year period ending December 31, 2004, Vanguard’s funds outperformed the majority of their peers as noted in the chart below:
Index Funds
Although there was an indexed account for institutional investors at Wells Fargo in 1971, the first real index fund, the First Index Investment Trust was founded by Jack Bogle in 1976. Known today as the Vanguard S&P 500 Index Fund, it is still the largest index fund in the world, with over $111 Billion in assets, more than the GDP of Vietnam. Since then Vanguard has established dozens of other index funds. A good index fund not only uses ultra-low costs to its advantage, but it also eliminates manager risk. It is well-known that most mutual fund managers don’t add value once the cost of the management is added in. Index funds essentially trade the possibility of outperformance for the guaranteed elimination of market underperformance.
So when choosing a mutual fund company to open an account with, Vanguard should be your default option. Instead of taking the profits for himself, St. Jack (Bogle) opted to change the mutual fund industry forever and allow the investors to keep the change. Over your investing career, this will probably be hundreds of thousands of dollars you get to keep in your pocket.
Great article but you have made one error. Fidelity is owned by the Ned Johnson family:
At some companies, such as Fidelity, the fund management company is owned by private owners (the Neff family).
We have a young lady in our family going to medical school this fall. I am definitely telling her about this website.
Thanks!
Of course you’re right, what was I thinking? I must have been thinking about John Neff for some reason. I’ll make the change.
Pingback: Why I Love The Roth IRA | The White Coat Investor- Investing And Personal Finance Information For Physicians, Dentists, Residents, Students, And Other Highly-Educated Busy Professionals
Pingback: Designing a doctor's portfolio- Part 6 | The White Coat Investor- Investing And Personal Finance Information For Physicians, Dentists, Residents, Students, And Other Highly-Educated Busy Professionals
Good write-up.
Since you wrote this, most of Vanguard’s funds are 0.19%, and some are an amazing 0.12%!
With admiral funds available with only a $10K investment, a good portion of my Vanguard fund ERs are less than 0.10%. Some of the international stuff is a bit more, but considering my 401K fees (not including ERs) are 0.5% of AUM, I’m pretty happy with the costs of my Vanguard investments.
What do you think of the Schwab index funds and ETFs? They seem to be carbon copies of the Vanguard funds, with expense ratios as low, or even lower if you are a Schwab customer.
We’re really dancing on the head of a pin here when we’re comparing Vanguard ETFs and Schwab ETFs. Personally, I think Vanguard is simply better at doing it. I believe this enough to pay commissions in my Schwab 401K to buy Vanguard ETFs instead of the Schwab ETFs. Once you get to ERs this low, a basis point or two just doesn’t matter and it comes down to execution.
All that said, there is very little difference and both companies do a good enough job of execution that I wouldn’t worry much about it if all I had in my 401K were Schwab funds. I do not, however, believe that Schwab would have low cost index funds and ETFs if Vanguard had never come along.
So when it comes to opening a Roth IRA would you recommend going with Vanguard over Capitolone360 (ing) or bank of america?
Yes.